• 5 mins read
  • Published

Solana settlement rails open to over 90 North Dakota banks

Catheryne Nicholson Crypto infrastructure writer EgonCoin

Post by Catheryne Nicholson

Solana settlement rails open to over 90 North Dakota banks EgonCoin © egoncoin.com
Solana settlement rails open to over 90 North Dakota banks © egoncoin.com

More than 90 North Dakota banks and credit unions can now settle payments on Solana through Fiserv and Roughrider Coin. The new system keeps funds in regular bank accounts while using blockchain for transfers.

North Dakota's banks just got a new way to move money. Over 90 banks and credit unions in the state now have access to a Solana-based payment rail, thanks to Fiserv's launch of Roughrider Coin. This is one of the largest state-level blockchain rollouts for regulated interbank transfers in the U.S. The real question is whether banks will actually use it for big transfers, or stick with the old systems.

How the system works

Fiserv has plugged Solana's blockchain into the daily operations of North Dakota's banks. Now, banks can start, approve, and settle payments between each other using Roughrider Coin. This token is permissioned, issued by VersaBank USA National Association, and governed by the Bank of North Dakota (BND). The process runs inside Fiserv's Commercial Center-the same online platform banks already use for ACH and wire transfers. Staff see the same screens, but the settlement happens on Solana in the background.

Fiserv's Digital Asset Platform now enables over 90 North Dakota banks and credit unions to access Solana-based interbank settlement, making it one of the largest state-level blockchain banking launches in the U.S.

Analyst

Each Roughrider Coin is backed one-to-one by U.S. dollars in special bank accounts. A bank has to move dollars into a "for benefit of" account before new tokens are minted. When tokens reach the recipient's wallet, they are burned automatically. This keeps token balances low and makes sure dollars never leave the regulated banking system, even though settlement happens on-chain. BND handles governance. Fiserv runs the platform. VersaBank takes care of minting, burning, custody, and reserves. Wallets are secured by Fireblocks. Solana's Token-2022 extensions add freeze and clawback controls for extra risk management.

Operational impact and limits

For North Dakota's community banks and credit unions, this adds another settlement option that fits into their current routines. The system is set up for treasury transfers and loan payoffs. It promises near-instant settlement and lower costs than traditional wires. But Fiserv and BND have not shared any numbers on cost savings or performance. There's no public data on how much money is actually moving through Roughrider Coin. Participation is voluntary and only open to regulated financial institutions. It's not clear how many will use blockchain settlement as a regular tool.

Daily netting and reconciliation still happen across VersaBank custody accounts and a concentration account at BND. This keeps token settlement separate from the actual movement of dollars between bank accounts. The hybrid setup means dollars stay in the banking system while tokens move and burn on Solana. The launch follows an earlier announcement in October 2025, which had aimed for a 2026 rollout.

Solana serves as the blockchain layer for transaction processing, while Fireblocks provides the digital infrastructure and tokenization for Roughrider Coin. This combination enables permissioned, dollar-backed stablecoin transfers exclusively between regulated North Dakota financial institutions.

Cointelegraph

Stablecoin or tokenized deposit?

Fiserv calls Roughrider Coin a stablecoin. BND calls it a dollar-backed token deposit. The label matters for regulation and how the market sees it, but both agree every token is fully backed by U.S. dollars and only minted after a bank transfer. The system is permissioned and only open to institutions, not the public. Using Solana's public blockchain adds transparency and audit trails, but only for the closed group of banks involved.

This launch is a big step for blockchain in U.S. banking, but it comes as more groups try out blockchain settlement rails. Mastercard and SoFi Bank recently started using stablecoins for card payments, as reported earlier. Still, it's not clear how much stablecoin volume those systems handle. North Dakota's setup keeps funds inside the banking system and limits access to regulated banks, which may avoid some of the risks tied to public stablecoins.

Deployment documents show the system uses Solana's Token-2022 extensions for wallet security and token management, including freeze and clawback features. The design aims to keep on-chain token balances low and maintain strict controls. But without public numbers on transaction volume or cost savings, it's too soon to say if the system delivers real benefits. For now, North Dakota banks have a new blockchain tool, but it remains to be seen if it will beat the old rails.

As of the October 1 launch, Fiserv says more than 90 North Dakota banks and credit unions are part of the rollout. This number shows how many have access, not how much money is moving or how often it's used. There's no public data yet on transaction speed, cost cuts, or payment volume through Roughrider Coin. The system's tie-in with existing banking channels could make it easier for banks to try, but without performance data, its real impact is still unknown.

Tokenized settlement systems like Roughrider Coin show the trade-offs between blockchain transparency and traditional banking controls. By keeping dollars in regulated accounts and using permissioned tokens on a public blockchain, the system tries to blend crypto speed and auditability with the oversight of legacy finance. This avoids some of the risks of public stablecoins, but also limits access and liquidity to a closed group of banks. As more banks test blockchain settlement, the main question is whether these hybrid models can really cut costs, speed up payments, and boost reliability-or if they just add new layers without clear gains for end users.

Related articles