• 5 mins read
  • Published

Grayscale's Zcash ETF Plan Raises Fee and Ownership Questions

Catheryne Nicholson Crypto infrastructure writer EgonCoin

Post by Catheryne Nicholson

Grayscale's Zcash ETF Plan Raises Fee and Ownership Questions EgonCoin © egoncoin.com
Grayscale's Zcash ETF Plan Raises Fee and Ownership Questions © egoncoin.com

Grayscale's proposed Zcash ETF would charge a 2.5% annual fee and could see DCG International control up to 34% of the fund, raising new questions about price tracking, liquidity, and investor influence

Grayscale is seeking to convert its Zcash Trust into an exchange-traded fund (ETF) with a 2.5% annual sponsor fee and a possible 34% ownership stake by DCG International, according to a recent SEC filing. The proposed ETF, which would be listed on NYSE Arca under the ticker ZCSH, remains in the registration phase and cannot yet be sold to investors. The SEC has not approved or disapproved the product, and the filing's effectiveness is still pending.

ETF Structure and Price Tracking

The move to an ETF structure is intended to address persistent price-tracking issues that have affected the Zcash Trust. Historically, the trust's shares have traded at significant premiums and discounts to the net asset value (NAV) of the underlying Zcash (ZEC) tokens. Between October 18, 2021, and June 30, 2026, the trust recorded a maximum 240% premium and a maximum 55% discount to NAV, with shares closing below NAV on 700 days during that period. The ETF model would introduce authorized participants-large market intermediaries able to create or redeem 10,000-share baskets-aiming to keep the ETF's market price closer to the value of the ZEC it holds. Grayscale expects this arbitrage mechanism to narrow the gap between share price and NAV, though perfect tracking is not guaranteed.

Fee Structure and Investor Impact

The proposed 2.5% annual sponsor fee, already in place for the existing trust, would continue under the ETF and be paid in ZEC. This fee accrues daily and gradually reduces the amount of ZEC represented by each share over time. For up to 12 months after the ETF's effectiveness, Grayscale says it will use all sponsor fees to support Zcash development, marketing, and education, though this plan is voluntary and can be revoked at any time. The filing also warns that DCG International Investments Ltd. and its affiliates could acquire a substantial stake-potentially up to 34%-in the ETF, which could give them significant influence over limited shareholder votes and create conflicts of interest with other investors. The actual ownership percentage will depend on future share creations, redemptions, and affiliate activity.

Liquidity, Concentration, and Market Risks

While the ETF structure is designed to improve liquidity and price alignment, several risks remain. The arbitrage process could be disrupted by cash-order constraints, limited ZEC market liquidity, or the suspension of share creations and redemptions. Concentrated ownership by DCG International or related parties could also reduce active trading and increase volatility, especially if large sales or the perception of such sales occur. The filing notes that as of June 30, 2026, the trust had 4,829,300 shares outstanding, each representing about 0.0805 ZEC. At that ratio, a 200,000 ZEC contribution would create roughly 2.485 million new shares, or about 34% of the enlarged total, assuming no other changes. Related-party holdings were classified at 757,202 shares, and when combined with potential new shares, the group's stake could approach but not exceed a majority under current conditions.

Regulatory and Market Context

The SEC's review of crypto ETF proposals remains ongoing, and the Zcash ETF's approval is not assured. The filing's amendment also addresses investor economics and privacy-related regulatory questions, reflecting the unique challenges of listing a privacy-focused asset like Zcash. ETF market structure issues have drawn attention in other contexts as well, such as when companies face delisting risks due to large altcoin holdings, as seen in a recent case involving Greenlane Holdings. For U.S. investors, the outcome of the Zcash ETF proposal could influence how privacy coins are treated in regulated investment products and whether similar structures are adopted for other digital assets.

As of June 30, 2026, the Zcash Trust reported 4,829,300 shares outstanding, each backed by approximately 0.0805 ZEC. During the period from October 18, 2021, to June 30, 2026, the trust's shares experienced an average premium of 53% and an average discount of 19% to NAV, highlighting the persistent price-tracking challenges that the ETF structure aims to address.

ETF arbitrage relies on the ability of authorized participants to create and redeem shares efficiently, which helps align the ETF's market price with the value of its underlying assets. In the context of cryptocurrency ETFs, this mechanism can be complicated by limited liquidity in the underlying token's market, regulatory restrictions, and operational constraints. When a small number of entities control a large share of ETF ownership, it can further impact trading dynamics, potentially increasing volatility and reducing the effectiveness of arbitrage. Investors considering crypto ETFs should understand these structural risks and how they differ from traditional equity or commodity ETFs.

Related articles